Two plastic product fabrication methods are injection molding and thermoforming. In these manufacturing processes, molten plastic is injected under pressure into a matrix to make parts. Thermoforming is the manufacturing procedure by which a sheet of heated plastic is exacted and stretched (via vacuum or pressure) onto the surface of a mold to make parts.
The main differences between the two are the process, the size of the parts produced, and the lead time. (IM) can mold most detailed parts between the halves of a mold in one procedure. In contrast, in thermoforming, the identical halves of a close part should be developed and connected separately.
(IM) is best for small parts, and thermoforming is better for more significant factors. It is because the part size is breaking the tooling and appliances needed to design components in (IM). (IM) is better for large-lot production, and multiple products can be made in the same cycle when thermoforming is superior for shorter, smaller runs.
Production lead times and parts made per cycle between the two processes also vary significantly. In thermoforming, one significant advantage is that its upfront cost and lead time for tooling are much lower than for (IM). In this subject, we fall deeper into the similarities and differences between (IM) vs thermoforming.
Injection Molding Definition and Comparison to Thermoforming
(IM) is a plastic manufacturing procedure involving an (IM) machine (IMM). In (IM), plastic pellets are fed into the injection barrel and fill up the “flights” or areas between the threads of the injection screw. The rotation of the screw and radiator bands placed on the barrel melt the pellets. It allows the materials to run into the conversion or compression sector from the feed zone. The molten materials are pressed as compact and workable to clear all air.
Material is compressed and melted, and a “melt pool’ ‘develops the material sector of the screw as it continues to rotate. While the molten materials enter the metering zone, practically all the volume between the flights of the bolt and barrel walls is filled with molten material. At this point, a suitable quantity of material is shot into the mold. The IMM holds pressure on the mold till the products have been properly formed and cooled, at which point the completed part is emitted.
The complete procedure is repeated continuously before all pieces are made. In 1872 (IM) was first developed by brothers Isaiah and John Hyatt. The first injection machine was used to form hair combs, buttons, and other small-scale items. Unlike thermoforming, (IM) is the usually cost-effective and well-organized method to manufacture plastic parts. For more information, see our guide on what (IM) is.
Write the Advantages of Injection Molding Resembled Thermoforming?
There are some advantages of injection molding compared to thermoforming:
1. Great for producing small and complex parts.
2. It is ideal for high-volume manufacturing since injection molds can have some cavities
3. Obliging to a high level of automation for high-volume production.
Write the Disadvantages of Injection Molding Resembled Thermoforming?
There are the following disadvantages of injection molding compared to thermoforming:
1. Extending conduct times for mold building and repair due to the complications of the shapes typically being molded.
2. High tooling and appliance costs can be a barrier for some companies wishing to use (IM).
Thermoforming Definition and Comparison to Injection Molding
Typically, thermoforming is a procedure in which the heated thermoplastic sheets are pressed into a single-sided mold to create products. Thermoformed creations can be performed by exerting force onto the sheet or pushing all air out of the mold. This process is called vacuum forming. The following parts are formed to trim and finish based on customer specifications.
Thermoforming is perfect for accessible geometries and parts with immense patience, like loading inserts, but is not acceptable for small, complex details or high-volume production. The idea of thermoforming developed back in 1855 when it could generate cellulose. John Hyatt, one of the people credited with creating (IM), tested cellulose as plain material; planning to develop a more rigid material, he connected nitrocellulose, camphor, and alcohol and started to develop the material sheets and rod.
It continuously left the final fabrication of products such as toys, bottles, and other items to other corporations. Nowadays, a vast variety of creations are produced by thermoforming – from toys to whole bathtubs and vehicle dashboards. Reached to (IM), thermoforming’s tooling costs are cheap, along with large parts that can be made fast for low-volume charges.
Write the Advantages of Thermoforming Compared to Injection Molding?
There are the following advantages of thermoforming compared to injection molding:
1. Lower tooling charges since thermoforming tools are usually produced from aluminum
2. More rapid prototyping and creation result since it is more comfortable with making thermoforming tooling than (IM) tooling
3. it can produce excellent for low-volume production runs or one-offs since only one part at a time
4. Easy to make repairs and improvements for tooling since thermoforming tooling is relatively simple
Write the Disadvantages of Thermoforming Resembled to Injection Molding?
There are the following disadvantages of thermoforming compared to injection molding:
- In high-volume production, it is not applicable since production output is low with thermoforming
2. Labor-intensive since some thermoformed parts must be post-processed to assemble customer specifications.
3. Wasteful, as strictly thermoformed parts may need various shots before they reach the expected shape.
Comparison Table Between Injection Molding and Thermoforming
Table 1 below shows a comparison of different attributes and properties of injection molding and thermoforming:
Table 1: Comparison of Injection Molding vs. Thermoforming
|Make small, detailed parts||Yes||No|
|Make large parts, but with big tolerances||No||Yes|
|Has low tooling costs||No||Yes|
|Has repeatable processes||Yes||Yes|
|Wide range of available materials||Yes||No|
Determining whether (IM) vs thermoforming is suitable for a task comes down to the exact conditions. If high-volume production is needed or the application is a small, complicated part, (IM) is better. When more extensive parts at low-volume displays are needed, thermoforming is better.
Injection Molding vs Thermoforming: Lead Cost Comparison
Tooling costs for thermoforming can be highly less than for (IM). Because pressures used in thermoforming are not as high as (IM), most thermoforming tooling is made from aluminum. Compare that to the (IM) process, which uses expensive tool steels such as P20 or H13. Fabricating tooling for (IM) can take a long time and may be much more labor-intensive than thermoforming molds due to the complexity of the molding parts.
Injection Molding vs Thermoforming: Speed Comparison
(IM) and thermoforming are excellent at making parts at an immediate rate. The primary distinction is that with (IM), molds can periodically have considerable cavities provided by the exact collection of molten material, showing much higher results. The final creation design and mold result are brief with thermoforming because it can efficiently change the tooling.
Injection Molding vs Thermoforming: Volume Comparison
(IM) holds up more increased production volumes than thermoforming. This is because injection molds can have considerable cavities. Some molds can have around 100 holes. On the other hand, only a single part is made during every molding cycle. As an effect, (IM) is significantly better for extensive or regular production orders.
Injection Molding vs Thermoforming: Materials Comparison
Injection molding and thermoforming can commonly use exact plastic fabrics, such as polyethene, polycarbonate, and PVC. Since injection molding operates plastic bullets and thermoforming services plastic sheets, the material used in thermoforming typically has more malleable and flexible features.
Write the Mutual Alternatives to Injection Molding and Thermoforming?
Following Mutual alternatives to both injection molding and thermoforming include:
Blow molding and extrusion molding are both states of plastic manufacturing that use many same materials operating in (IM) and thermoforming. They make plastic products in extensive volumes and are highly repeatable procedures. While extrusion molding is employed for items with fixed cross-sectional forms over long distances, such as weather seals, pipes, and door frames, blow molding is used mainly for creating containers and bottles.
Write the Similarities Between Injection Molding and Thermoforming?
Similarities between injection molding and thermoforming include:
1. Both methods are repeatable and are perfect for producing high-quality parts.
2. Both operate thermoplastic materials to create parts.
Write the Other Comparisons for Injection Molding Besides Thermoforming?
Described down is another alternative to injection molding:
- Injection Molding vs 3D Printing: 3D printing is a manufacturing procedure that can efficiently produce parts with compound geometry, as (IM) does. Due to undercuts and other unholdable characteristics, some other complex-geometry parts cannot be created with (IM). 3D printing avoids this difficulty and can print any piece without significance, with comfort and speed.
Write the Other Comparisons for Thermoforming Besides Injection Molding?
- Described below is another alternative to thermoforming:
Thermoforming vs Blow Molding: At a time, thermoforming can be operated to create one half of an assembly, and blow molding can create both halves of an open receptacle in one cycle. Bottles, containers, and other things can easily be constructed with blow molding.
This subject gives the differentiation of (IM) and thermoforming and describes what they had conferred the various features of each.
Feel Free to Contact Our Professional Machinists to Discuss your requirements.
It supplies a vast range of manufacturing capacities, including (IM) and other value-added benefits for all your prototyping and production requirements.